AI Risks and Ethics: Biases & Regulations

As AI adoption accelerates, AI risks and ethics come to the forefront of global debate. In this article, we explore the dark side of AI, including bias, misinformation, and job disruption, offer actionable strategies for mitigating AI hallucinations in enterprise applications, and analyze the impact of new regulations like the EU AI Act and US Executive Order.

Risks of Bias, Misinformation, and Job Disruption

Bias and Fairness

AI systems can perpetuate and even amplify social biases present in training data, which often reflect societal prejudices. For example, facial recognition systems have shown higher error rates for people of color due to underrepresentation in datasets. 

Types of Bias:
  • Data Bias: Skewed or incomplete data leads to unfair outcomes
  • Algorithmic Bias: Model design choices can amplify existing disparities
  • User Interaction Bias: Feedback loops from user behavior can reinforce stereotypes

Documented cases include discrimination in lending, hiring, and criminal justice. 

Addressing these issues requires:
  • Conduct regular bias audits using statistical fairness metrics throughout development
  • Use technical solutions like adversarial debiasing and reweighting techniques to balance datasets
  • Involve diverse teams in data annotation and system design
  • Establish clear accountability for AI-driven decisions

Misinformation and Hallucinations

Generative AI models, especially large language models (LLMs), are prone to “hallucinations”, producing plausible but false information. This risk is heightened in sectors like healthcare, finance, and customer support, where inaccurate outputs can have serious consequences. For instance, medical chatbots providing inaccurate diagnoses or financial advisors suggesting non-existent investment products can cause significant harm.

Propagation of Misinformation:
    • AI-generated content can spread rapidly on social media, amplifying false narratives
    • Deepfakes and synthetic media can erode trust in digital content
What can you do?
  • Implement retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to ground AI outputs in verified data sources
  • Use fact-checking pipelines and real-time verification to filter out hallucinations
  • Set up confidence thresholds and warning systems for uncertain outputs
  • Educate users about the limitations and risks of AI-generated content

Job Disruption

AI-driven automation is reshaping the workforce. While AI can automate repetitive tasks and augment human capabilities, it also raises concerns about job displacement, particularly in roles involving routine or predictable work. Artificial Intelligence automates repetitive and predictable tasks across various industries, making jobs involving routine data entry, manufacturing, logistics, standardized customer service, and software development the most vulnerable. On the other hand, new job opportunities are emerging in areas such as AI governance, data labeling, prompt engineering, and model auditing.
In the short term, there will be job displacement and challenges related to reskilling the workforce. In the long term, we can expect a shift toward higher-value, creative, and oversight roles.
It is important to invest in workforce reskilling and upskilling programs, foster public-private partnerships to support job transitions, and encourage lifelong learning and digital literacy.

How to Mitigate AI Hallucinations in Enterprise Applications

Enterprises adopting AI must prioritize reliability and factual accuracy. 

  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Cross-checking AI outputs against curated databases or the web in real time, reducing hallucinations by 20–30%
  • Verification Pipelines: Implement self-verification mechanisms, such as Chain of Verification (CoVe) and Real-time Verification and Rectification (EVER), to validate and correct outputs before delivery
  • Domain-Specific Benchmarks: Develop and regularly update a database of industry-specific facts and edge cases. Use this for prompt engineering and model evaluation
  • Human-in-the-Loop: Maintain human oversight to review and approve AI-generated content, especially in high-stakes scenarios
  • Guardrails and Filters: Apply rules and confidence thresholds to flag or block low-confidence outputs before they reach end users
Explore AI risks and ethics in 2025, from bias to job disruption, and new regulations like the EU AI Act and US Executive Order impacting global AI development.

AI Regulation in 2024: What the EU AI Act & US Executive Order Mean for Tech

The EU AI Act

« read more about the AI Act in our article here »

The EU AI Act, effective August 2024, is the world’s first comprehensive legal framework for AI. It introduces:

  • Risk-based approach: AI systems are categorized as minimal, specific transparency, high, or unacceptable risk.

     

    • Minimal risk: No obligations (e.g., spam filters).

       

    • Specific transparency risk: Disclosure requirements for chatbots and AI-generated content.

       

    • High risk: Strict requirements for sectors like healthcare and recruitment, including risk mitigation, high-quality datasets, user information, and human oversight.

    • Unacceptable risk: Bans on AI for social scoring and other practices that threaten fundamental rights
The US Executive Order

In January 2025, the US issued a new Executive Order on AI, revoking previous directives to prioritize innovation and global competitiveness. Key points:

  • Focus on innovation: Removes barriers to AI development and aims to ensure US leadership in AI.

  • Bias and security: Emphasizes developing AI systems free from ideological bias and engineered agendas.

  • Action plan: Directs agencies to develop an action plan for AI dominance, with new advisory roles and oversight structures

Conclusion

AI’s transformative potential comes with significant ethical, regulatory, and workforce challenges. Addressing bias, misinformation, and job disruption requires robust governance, technical safeguards, and proactive adaptation to new regulations. While AI will automate many tasks, human expertise remains indispensable for oversight, innovation, and ensuring AI serves the greater good

If you would like to know more about the world of startups, or have any questions regarding starting one, do not hesitate to contact us, or book a consultation with one of our colleagues by clicking here.

Exciting developments
are underway at Kassailaw!
Our team of legal and technology experts is hard at work, preparing to launch a new and innovative way to access information and knowledge. This interactive platform will provide an immersive and engaging experience and we’re eager to share it with you.
Stay tuned!
🔥💡💻

Bence Mehesz

Legal Intern

5985360377124343232

+36 30 683 4402

ENG / HUN / GER

“Is your team the dream team? How much percentage should each founder get?” One of the core ingredients to success is the right team with complementing skills and personalities: early stage investors (and business partners too, by the way) will invest in the team, not the idea. Our goal is to guide you in building a strong and well-functioning team, as well as help you uncover potential friction points or weaknesses in the team, so that you can address them in the very beginning. When it comes to the fair split with your co-founders, if you need a reference point, or just want reassurance, we have developed our own tool for equity split calculation. Hint: the one answer that’s certainly wrong is a hasty 50-50 split.

You have spotted a problem and found a viable solution – in other words, you have your idea. What’s the next step? You need to make sure that the problem your business is trying to solve is a valid problem for a wide enough group, and that

Are you sure that the problem your business is trying to solve is a valid problem for a wide enough group? 

When you spot a problem and think you have found a viable solution to create a business around, it’s all too easy to get excited and jump straight into ideating a solution.

Avoid making something and then hoping people buy it when you could research what people need and then make that.

It doesn’t make any sense to make a key and then run around looking for a lock to open.

There are many ingredients in the recipe for creating a successful startup, but most certainly whatever you read and wherever you go, one of the first pieces of advice is going to be to do your homework properly regarding the validation. You have to validate both your problem and your solution to be able to define the perfect problem-solution and later on the product-market fit. If you manipulate your future customers into liking your solution or do not reveal all the aspects and layers of a problem you identified, your idea can easily lose its ground and with that the probability of it surviving and actually being turned into a prosperous business. Let us know if we can help at this initial but yet super-important stage.

Validation is the first step in moving towards learning more about the problem you are ultimately looking to solve.

Finding your unique value proposition is only possible if you take a thorough glance at your competitors. The world of tech is highly competitive, particularly so when you operate in a field with low entry barriers, you need to carefully examine and regularly update the news and developments of those companies who act in the same field and market. This might lead to several pivots for you if necessary, because you can significantly increase your chances of success if you can offer a—at least in some aspect—unique solution to your customers. The introduction as “we are like Uber/Snapchat/WeWork/Spotify, only better” is hardly sufficient in most cases. Unless you really are so much better, but then you need to know that too, so up the competitive analysis.